Comparison

Blind Storage vs Backblaze

Backblaze is excellent at cheap, reliable object storage and dead-simple computer backup. Blind Storage solves a different problem: provable privacy. We encrypt on your device before data reaches any server — Backblaze architecturally can read everything you store with them. Many teams use both: Backblaze B2 for raw storage economics, Blind Storage when the data itself must stay secret.

FeatureBlind StorageBackblaze
Zero-knowledge encryption (provider cannot read files)

Backblaze offers optional private encryption key for Computer Backup, but it's bolt-on — not the default architecture.

Provider-agnostic (BYO S3 backend)
Open-source client
Secure file sharing

B2 is raw object storage — no consumer sharing layer.

Zero egress fees (B2)

Depends on your chosen backend; B2 itself has zero egress.

Unlimited computer backup agent
Lowest cost per terabyte
Server-side search & thumbnails

Incompatible with true zero-knowledge — providers need plaintext.

Where Backblaze wins (honestly)

We're not here to pretend every product is worse at everything. Here's what Backblaze does better today:

  • Lower $/TB pricing

    Backblaze B2 at ~$6/TB/month undercuts most providers on raw storage cost. Blind Storage charges for encryption, compliance, and portability — not bulk terabytes.

  • Mature, set-and-forget backup

    Backblaze Computer Backup has 17 years of polish: install an agent, forget about it. Blind Storage is pre-launch and targets users who actively choose zero-knowledge — not passive backup.

  • Published reliability data

    Backblaze publishes annual hard-drive failure stats — a rare transparency win. We're building toward independent audits (Cure53 / NCC Group) but don't have a decade of operational history yet.

FAQ

Want zero-knowledge on your own backend?

Blind Storage encrypts on your device and works with any S3-compatible provider — including Backblaze B2 if you want their pricing with our privacy model.

Join the waitlist